By imagining systems that reproduce the results of reality
Is how we understand it
It is how theories are formed and maintained
When a system produces results that don’t match
We start a new to find a more accurate system
Maybe fine tune the current one a bit
But in all cases
They’re born from our mind space
Imagining these systems applied to an imagined reality
And visualizing the results they should produce
Does it match with what we observe
Or is it far from it
When we don’t know enough for an educated imagination
Or we simply lack imagination
Or we wish to test the imagined system
We come up with inputs and predict outputs
Based on the imagined system
Then we put them through the true system
If they match, good, if not, not so good
But nonetheless
As mentioned well before
A match does not guarantee anything
As nothing says that every system is one-to-one
As a one-way function
Any other system could replicate the true system
Their innards being different, but behavior being exact
Meaning the imagined system isn’t the true system
But can be sufficient for things like engineering
But not for curiosity and truths sake
Interesting how everything is treated as a complex system
Sometimes ignoring minorities
But what if those ignored minorities are what connects every system into the true largely connected system
That defines the universe
But of course for basic engineering and sciences they’re less important
But for the overall philosophical and beauty of understanding, they’re more than less important
They cannot be seen as ignored minorities
Each factor has an influence
Obvious it is though
The universe is one large system
Seen through the sciences as a collection of broken systems
Like a puzzle soon to be brought together
Is physics finding the construction of the puzzle pieces
Or is it finding the picture itself
No, no, it’s not the same
Poor analogy (?)
Physics is describing the underlying behavior and structure of everything, right?
Which is essentially the complex system
The theory of everything
But one note
The internal behavior is projected outwards
If true
The underlying truth should be seen outwards in all the visualized systems
As some similar pattern
Like a beat
Every systems behavior is based on it
So why shouldn’t it be deductible
And I’m not talking about the commonality or chemistry or physics
I mean a heart beat common in all
The life of the universe
I’m simply rambling